Monthly Archives: June 2017

Muslim Reform Movement by M. Zuhdi Jasser and Raheel Raza et al

  • We reject interpretations of Islam that call for any violence, social injustice and politicized Islam. We invite our fellow Muslims and neighbors to join us.


  • We reject bigotry, oppression and violence against all people based on any prejudice, including ethnicity, gender, language, belief, religion, sexual orientation and gender expression.

  • We are for secular governance, democracy and liberty.

  • Every individual has the right to publicly express criticism of Islam. Ideas do not have rights. Human beings have rights.

  • We stand for peace, human rights and secular governance. Please stand with us!

Preamble

We are Muslims who live in the 21st century. We stand for a respectful, merciful and inclusive interpretation of Islam. We are in a battle for the soul of Islam, and an Islamic renewal must defeat the ideology of Islamism, or politicized Islam, which seeks to create Islamic states, as well as an Islamic caliphate. We seek to reclaim the progressive spirit with which Islam was born in the 7th century to fast forward it into the 21st century. We support the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which was adopted by United Nations member states in 1948.

We reject interpretations of Islam that call for any violence, social injustice and politicized Islam. Facing the threat of terrorism, intolerance, and social injustice in the name of Islam, we have reflected on how we can transform our communities based on three principles: peace, human rights and secular governance. We are announcing today the formation of an international initiative: the Muslim Reform Movement.

We have courageous reformers from around the world who will outline our Declaration for Muslim Reform, a living document that we will continue to enhance as our journey continues. We invite our fellow Muslims and neighbors to join us.

DECLARATION

A. Peace: National Security, Counterterrorism and Foreign Policy

1. We stand for universal peace, love and compassion. We reject violent jihad. We believe we must target the ideology of violent Islamist extremism in order to liberate individuals from the scourge of oppression and terrorism both in Muslim-majority societies and the West.

2. We stand for the protection of all people of all faiths and non-faith who seek freedom from dictatorships, theocracies and Islamist extremists.

3. We reject bigotry, oppression and violence against all people based on any prejudice, including ethnicity, gender, language, belief, religion, sexual orientation and gender expression.

B. Human Rights: Women’s Rights and Minority Rights

1. We stand for human rights and justice. We support equal rights and dignity for all people, including minorities. We support the United Nations Declaration of Human Rights.

2. We reject tribalism, castes, monarchies and patriarchies and consider all people equal with no birth rights other than human rights. All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights. Muslims don’t have an exclusive right to “heaven.”

3. We support equal rights for women, including equal rights to inheritance, witness, work, mobility, personal law, education, and employment. Men and women have equal rights in mosques, boards, leadership and all spheres of society. We reject sexism and misogyny.

C. Secular Governance: Freedom of Speech and Religion

1. We are for secular governance, democracy and liberty. We are against political movements in the name of religion. We separate mosque and state. We are loyal to the nations in which we live. We reject the idea of the Islamic state. There is no need for an Islamic caliphate. We oppose institutionalized sharia. Sharia is manmade.

2. We believe in life, joy, free speech and the beauty all around us. Every individual has the right to publicly express criticism of Islam. Ideas do not have rights. Human beings have rights. We reject blasphemy laws. They are a cover for the restriction of freedom of speech and religion. We affirm every individual’s right to participate equally in ijtihad, or critical thinking, and we seek a revival of ijtihad.

3. We believe in freedom of religion and the right of all people to express and practice their faith, or non-faith, without threat of intimidation, persecution, discrimination or violence. Apostasy is not a crime. Our ummah–our community–is not just Muslims, but all of humanity.

We stand for peace, human rights and secular governance. Please stand with us!

Affirmed this Fourth Day of December, Two-Thousand and Fifteen By the founding authors who are signatories below

#MuslimReform
Twitter: @TheMuslimReform
Facebook: Muslim Reform Movement
Email: MuslimReformMovement@gmail.com Website: www.MuslimReformMovement.org

Please sign our declaration on Change.org!

Founding Signatories

Tahir Gora,
Author, Journalist, Activist, Toronto, Canada

Tawfik Hamid
Islamic Thinker and Reformer, Oakton, VA, USA

Usama Hasan
Imam, Quilliam Foundation, London, UK

Arif Humayun
Senior Fellow, American Islamic Forum for Democracy, Portland, OR, USA

Farahnaz Ispahani
Author, Former Member of Parliament, Pakistan, Washington, D.C., USA

M. Zuhdi Jasser, M.D.
President, American Islamic Forum for Democracy, Phoenix, AZ USA

Mohamad Jebara
Imam, Cordova Center, Ottawa, Canada

Naser Khader
Member, Danish Parliament, Muslim democracy activist
Copenhagen, Denmark

Courtney Lonergan
Community Outreach Director, American Islamic Forum for Democracy, Professional facilitator

Hasan Mahmud
Resident expert in sharia, Muslims Facing Tomorrow, Toronto, Canada

Asra Nomani
Journalist, Author, Morgantown, WV, USA

Raheel Raza
Founder, Muslims Facing Tomorrow, Toronto, Canada

Sohail Raza
Vice President, Coalition of Progressive Canadian Muslim Organizations

Salma Siddiqui
President, Coalition of Progressive Canadian Muslim Organizations, Toronto, Canada

Muslim Officials Harass US Congressmen on Temple Mount

“When there is a lack of resolve in protecting religious freedoms, it emboldens those who have no compunction about suppressing it,” said Rep. Trent Franks (R-AZ).


Men wearing the insignia of the Jordanian Waqf(Islamic trust) stalked and shouted at a delegation of US Congressmen visiting the Temple Mount, claiming that the Americans were not modestly dressed and accusing them of referring to the Jewish history of the Temple Mount.

“We walked up there, and were almost immediately approached by several men who started shouting,” Rep. Keith Rothfus (R-PA) told the Jerusalem Post. “We were tracked the entire time we were there and found these individuals surprisingly intolerant and belligerent.”

The trouble began when Muslim men accosted Elizabeth Jenkins, the wife of Rep. Evan Jenkins (R-WV), and said that she was not dressed appropriately, despite the fact that she was wearing long sleeves and a calf-length skirt. Police were required to disperse the tormenters.

The group continued on their tour, only for their guide to be interrupted by a man demanding to know if there would be any discussion of the Temple and insisting that the site be called the Dome of the Rock rather than the Temple Mount. Men wearing the insignia of the Islamic Waqf, which administers the site, also attempted to confiscate the guide’s maps and diagrams.

“When there is a lack of resolve in protecting religious freedoms, it emboldens those who have no compunction about suppressing it,” said Rep. Trent Franks (R-AZ), co-chair of the Israel Allies Foundation’s congressional caucus, which organized the trip.

French Tourist Temple Mount

An injured Christian tourist escorted by Israeli police after being attacked. (Rotter.net)

“There was an effort to completely suppress not only any expression of religious conviction, but any articulation of historical reality,” he added, saying the incident “shows the fundamental dynamics of the greater contention throughout the Middle East.”

The Temple Mount is the holiest site in Judaism.

Dozens of Palestinian religious leaders, under the initiative of former Grand Mufti of Jerusalem Sheikh Ekrima Sa’id Sabri, issued a declaration last week stating that the Temple Mount is only holy to Muslims and that it is a “desecration” for Jews to enter the site. AChristian tourist from France was assaulted by a mob on August 4 for waving an Israeli flag. There were also riots attacking Jews on Tisha b’Av, the day of mourning for the destruction of both Temples.

By Sara Abramowicz, United with Israel

Muslim Invasion of Europe by Guy Millière

  • The Syrian government sells passports and birth certificates at affordable prices. Many migrants have no passport, no ID, and refuse to give fingerprints.

  • Because Islam is the heart of the culture of people formerly colonized, Europeans rejected criticism of Islam, saying it would blend smoothly into a multicultural Europe. They did not demand the assimilation of the Muslims who came to live in Europe. Much of the time, Muslims are not assimilated — and often show signs of not wanting to assimilate.

  • Any criticism of Islam in Europe is treated as a form of racism, and “Islamophobia” is considered a crime or a sign of mental illness.

  • European people still have the right to vote, but are deprived of most of their power: all important political decisions in Europe are made behind closed doors by technocrats and professional politicians in Brussels or Strasbourg.

  • Europe has renounced force, so to many, it appears weak, vulnerable and easily able to be overpowered.

  • The sudden arrival of hundreds of thousands more Muslims most likely prompts Europeans to think that the nightmare will get worse; they see, powerlessly, that their leaders speak and act as if they have no awareness of what is happening.

  • Central European leaders and people, who have already lived under authoritarian rule, seem to be thinking that entering the European Union was a huge mistake. They came to what was then called the “free world.” They do not seem willing to be subjected again to coercive decisions made by outsiders.

  • Illegal Muslim migrants will live on social benefits until the bankruptcy of welfare states.

  • In all 28 countries of the European Union, birth rates are low and the population is aging. People under thirty account for only 16% of the population, or 80 million people. In the 22 Arab countries, plus Turkey and Iran, people under thirty account for 70% of the population, or 350 million people.

The flow of illegal migrants does not stop. They land on the Greek islands along the Turkish coast. They still try to get into Hungary, despite a razor wire fence and mobilized army. Their destination is Germany or Scandinavia, sometimes France or the UK. Some of them still arrive from Libya. Since the beginning of January, more than 620,000 have arrived by sea alone. There will undoubtedly be many more: a leaked secret document estimates that by the end of December, there might be 1.5 million.

Journalists in Western Europe continue to depict them as “refugees” fleeing war in Syria. The description is false. According to statistics released by the European Union, only twenty-five percent of them come from Syria; the true number is probably lower. The Syrian government sells passports and birth certificates at affordable prices. The vast majority of migrants come from other countries: Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Eritrea, Somalia, and Nigeria.

Many do not seem to have left in a hurry. Many bring new high-end smartphones and large sums of cash, ten or twenty thousand euros, sometimes more. Many have no passports, no ID, and refuse to give fingerprints.

Whenever people flee to survive, the men come with whole families: women, children, elders. Here, instead, more than 75% of those who arrive are men under 50; few are women, children or elders.

As Christians are now the main targets of Islamists (the Jews fled or were forced out decades ago), the people escaping the war in Syria should be largely composed of Christians. But Christians are a small minority among those who arrive, and they often hide that they are Christians.

Those who enter Europe are almost all Muslims, and behave as some Muslims often do in the Muslim world: they harass Christians and attack women. In reception centers, harassing Christians and attacking women are workaday incidents. European women and girls who live near reception centers are advised to take care and cover up. Rapes, assaults, stabbings and other crimes are on the rise.

Western European political leaders could tell the truth and act accordingly. They do not. They talk of “solidarity,” “humanitarian duty,” “compassion.” From the beginning, Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany said that illegal migrants were welcome: she seemed to change her mind for a moment, but quickly slid back. In France, President François Hollande says the same things as Angela Merkel.

After the heartbreaking image of a dead child being carried on a Turkish beach was published, thousands of Germans and French initially spoke the same way as their leaders. Their enthusiasm seems to have faded fast.

The people of Central Europe were not enthusiastic from the beginning. Their leaders seem to share the feelings of their populations. None spoke as explicitly as Viktor Orbán, Prime Minister of Hungary. He said out loud what many of his countrymen seemed to think. He spoke of “invasion” and asked if there were another word to describe the massive and often brutal entry into a country of people who have not been invited to do so. He added that a country has theright to decide who is allowed to enter its territory and to guard its borders. He stressed that those who enter Europe are from a “different culture,” and suggested that Islam might not be compatible with European Judeo-Christian values.

Western European political leaders harshly condemned his remarks and the attitude of Central Europe in general. They decided to take a hard line approach, including: forcing recalcitrant countries to welcome immigrants, setting up mandatory quotas that define how many immigrants each EU country must receive, and threatening those countries that declined to obey. Martin Schulz, President of the European Parliament, said that Europe was built in a spirit of “burden sharing,” and that EU breakup was a risk that could not be excluded.

An acute division, in fact, is emerging between the leaders of Western Europe and the leaders of Central Europe. Another division is growing between the populations of Western Europe and their leaders.

Those who rebuilt Europe after World War II thought that an enlightened elite (themselves) could make a clean sweep of the past and build a dream society where peace and perpetual harmony would reign.

Because they thought democracy had brought Hitler to power, they decided to restrict democracy.[1] Because they thought nationalism was the cause of the war, they decreed that nationalism was harmful and that the cultural identities in Europe had to disappear and be replaced by a new “European identity” that they would shape.[2]

Because Europe had a colonialist past and Europeans had believed in the superiority of their cultures, they claimed that Europe should redeem its guilt and affirm that all cultures were equal. And because Islam was at the heart of the culture of people formerly colonized, the Europeans rejected all criticism of Islam, and said that it would blend smoothly into amulticultural Europe. They did not demand the assimilation of Muslims who came to live in Europe in increasing number.

Because the Europeans thought poverty had led to the rise of Nazism, they built welfare states that were supposed to eliminate poverty forever.

Because two world wars had started in Europe, the Europeans decreed that from now on, Europe would renounce the use of force, and solve all conflicts through diplomacy and appeasement.[3]

We now see the results.

European people still have the right to vote, but are deprived of most of their power: all important political decisions in Europe are made behind closed doors, by technocrats and professional politicians, in Brussels or Strasbourg.

Cultural identities in Europe have been eroded to such a point that saying that Europe is based on Judeo-Christian values has become controversial.

Any criticism of Islam in Europe is treated as a form of racism, and “Islamophobia” is considered a crime or a sign of mental illness.

Islam has not melted into a smooth multiculturalism; it is creating increasingly distressing problems that are almost never brought to light.

Muslim criminality across Europe is high. Consequently, the percentage of Muslims in prisonsin Europe is high. In France, which has the largest Muslim population in Europe, the prison population is 70% Muslim. Many European prisons have become recruitment centers for future jihadis.

Muslim riots may occur for any reason : police upholding the law, a Soccer League celebrationor in support of a cause.

Welfare states have created a government-dependent class in Europe of many people who live permanently on social benefits. These people are often Muslim. Much of the time, they are not assimilated – and often show signs of not wanting to assimilate. Many reside in virtually autonomous, so-called no-go zones (e.g. France, the UK, and Germany).

Europe has renounced force; to many, it therefore appears weak, vulnerable and easily able to be overpowered.

Populations of Western Europe increasingly think that the dream society that had been promised has turned into a nightmare. The sudden and often brutal arrival of hundreds of thousands more Muslims most likely prompts Europeans to think the nightmare will get worse. They see, powerlessly, that their leaders speak and act as if they have no awareness of what is happening.

Central European leaders and their people, who have directly experienced authoritarian rule, seem to be thinking that entering the European Union was a huge mistake. When the Soviet Union collapsed, they became members of the EU to join what was called then the “free world.” They do not seem willing to be subjected again to coercive decisions made by outsiders.

After living under the Soviet yoke, they preserved their desire for freedom and self-government, and evidently will not now agree to give them up. They know what submission to Islam could mean. Bulgaria and Romania were occupied by the Ottoman Empire until 1878. Hungary was under the boot of Ottoman rule for more than a hundred and fifty years (1541-1699).

Polls show that a majority of Muslims living in Europe want the application of sharia law and clearly reject any idea of assimilation.

Hundreds of thousands of Muslims living in Europe have joined fundamentalist Islamic organizations. Thousands have joined jihadist movements and are now fighting in Syria or Yemen. Many have returned and are ready to act against Europe.

Illegal Muslim migrants are likely to join the Muslims already living in Europe; and they will remain Muslim. They will live on social benefits until the bankruptcy of welfare states. They will reside in the “no-go zones,” and the “no-go zones” will continue to grow. Their occupants come from countries where Christians and women are mistreated; in Europe, they are already mistreating Christians and women.

They come from countries where Western civilization is despised and where hatred of Jews is inescapable — and this remains so among Muslims already living in Europe. For more than two decades, almost all assaults against Jews in Europe were committed by Muslims.

Many of those who arrive, according to European intelligence sources, are already radicalized.

project to overwhelm Europe by a huge wave of migration was already described by the Islamic State in documents discovered this February. It is hard to rule out that the Islamic State plays a role in what is happening. Turkish authorities are ignoring the massive departurestaking place from their coast. If they really wanted the current process to stop, they could stop it. That is clearly not what they do. The Islamic State could not survive without Turkish help. Daily flights on Turkish Airlines bring illegal migrants to Istanbul; they continue unhindered to Europe. The Russians, in their military intervention in Syria, similarly does not seem interested in stopping what is occurring.

Angela Merkel said in Strasbourg, on October 7, that migrants entering Europe today are attracted to Europe, for the reasons Europeans migrants who arrived in America a century ago were attracted to America: to “realize a dream,” presumably of opportunity.

In all 28 countries of the European Union, birth rates are low and the population is aging. People under thirty account for only 16% of the population, or 80 million people. In the 22 Arab countries, plus Turkey and Iran, people under thirty account for 70% of the population, or 350 million people.

Jews are fleeing Europe in increasing numbers. “Native” Europeans are starting to flee as well.

In 1972, in his book “The Camp of the Saints,” French writer Jean Raspail described flooding Europe with Muslim migrants crossing the Mediterranean. At the time, the book was a work of fiction. Today, it is reality.

Out with the old, in with the new… European officials estimate that 1.5 million migrants, mostly Muslims, will arrive in the European Union this year. Jews are fleeing Europe in increasing numbers. “Native” Europeans are starting to flee as well.

Muslim Extremists: Cheerleading the Killers by Khadija Khan

  • Cheerleading for killers and terror-mongering has become synonymous with the countries where religious extremists enjoy popular and official support.

  • This is exactly what is wrong with the Muslim world, where masses are kept ignorant by these radical mullahs from the real challenges such as poverty, illiteracy and disease.
  • Instead, at the behest of the powerful extremist regimes such as Saudi Arabia and Iran, which throw unlimited money into poor countries to expand their radicalization, extremist religious parties feed the people with the false notion of the supremacy of their creed.
  • Some of the terrorists have entered Europe with the refugees. If this amount is just one percent, that number comes to 10,000 people.
  • However, the wrong political policies of governments in Europe are also to be blamed for the rise of Islamic extremism in the world: they allowed the existence and breeding of such organizations on their soil at the first place.
  • Time has come for those who are still confused about the acts of these terrorists — or those who serve as terrorist apologists to try to cover up their deeds after every incident — to be exposed. A large number of Muslims are already sick and tired of these extremists.
  • We Muslims also need to leave no stone unturned to return the humane gestures that our fellow citizens have shown when we Muslims faced trouble. In the same way they took to the streets for us, it is now our turn to show all our fellow citizens — non-Muslims as well as Muslims — that we also stand by them. Merry Christmas!!!

The world saw a massacre in Aleppo, the assassination of Russian ambassador in Turkey, a brazen terror attack in Berlin and a shooting incident in a Zurich mosque – all just last week. We also saw religious extremists across the Muslim world cheering for the killers of both the Russian envoy and the truck driver in Germany.

ISIS hailed the Berlin terror attack and the killing of the Russian ambassador while themselves facing imminent extinction due to massive Russian, European and US led strikes against their strongholds in Mosul, Raqqa, Aleppo and other cities.

Terrorists such as ISIS and their sympathizers seemed translating this chaos into another opportunity to pour the “victim narrative” into the minds of naïve Muslim youths apparently in the hope of recruiting more soldiers for their holy war.

One incident of the behavior witnessed in Pakistan where the biggest religious political party was seen cheerleading for the anti-Russia attack, hailing the extremist Muslim killer, Melvut Mert-Altintas, as a hero.

Jamaat e Islami (JI), a radical political party in nuclear-armed Pakistan, has never been able to win popular support in the parliament, yet is being blamed for the butchery against Bengalis in 1970s. Jamaat is involved in celebrating the killers, and they have hundreds of thousands of followers across the Subcontinent as well as in Pakistan.

This is not the new trend for JI, as they have been involved in marketing the radical version of Islam while celebrating the terrorists like Osama bin Laden as heroes for decades.

Hence, cheerleading for killers and terror mongering become synonymous with the countries where religious extremists enjoy popular and official support.

This is exactly what is wrong with the Muslim world where masses are kept ignorant by these radical mullahs from the real challenges such as poverty, illiteracy and disease.

Instead, at the behest of the powerful extremist regimes such as Saudi Arabia and Iran, which throw unlimited money into poor countries to expand their radicalization, extremist religious parties feed the people with the false notion of the supremacy of their creed.

It often appears that, out of this havoc, these terror organizations and their handlers are fixed on dragging the world back into the Stone Age by invoking their counterparts in the West as their “rivals” to get the kind of imaginative wars they were taught about by their “spiritual” role models.

The Berlin terror suspect Anis Amri who was shot dead by Italian police in Milan after he opened fire on police for demanding identity documents on Friday.

He was one of the petty criminals who were hooked up by ISIS to massacre so many innocent shoppers in Berlin.

Paris terror attack mastermind Salah Abdeslam is another example of such low-life criminals who took the path of killings in pursuit to become a hero for cause of ISIS.

Anis Amri was reportedly in touch with a hardliner extremist organization in Germany after entering the Europe disguised as an asylum seeker.

There seems to be a clear pattern in the working of such terror organizations, which run as propaganda and recruitment fronts, mostly among youths who are “seeking a purpose” after failing to succeed in life.

However, the wrong political policies of governments in Europe are also to be blamed for the rise of Islamic extremism in the world: they allowed the existence and breeding of such organizations on their soil at the first place.

There are many fanatic groups and organizations operating in the West, such as Hizb ut-Tahrir, TWR True Religion, Al Muhajiroon, Al-Ghurabaa, Al-Shabaab, as well as dozens of small groups operating in different mosques in the name of charity and support for Syrian victims.

On December 23, 2016 two British men were convicted of funding extremists in the Middle Eastern war zone.

Some terrorists have entered Europe with the refugees. If the amount is just one percent, that number comes to 10,000 people. Most of them mainly work only as foot-soldiers during the terror campaign, while instructions and logistics support are provided to them by their already established comrades — such as the Paris attack terrorist, Salah Abdeslam, who killed 130 innocent people and injured more.

Some of the terrorists involved in the attacks in France were reportedly picked up from refugee camps, thus indicating coordinated plotting by these killers.

In the wake of terrorist attacks in 2015, some of the gunmen were identified as routine visitors to Molenbeek, a district of Brussels considered the hub of jihadists, drug addicts and dealers, and gangs, while acting as a no-go zone for police and as a safe haven for criminals.

“Routine visitors” included most of perpetrators of the Belgian attacks: the French-Algerian, Mehdi Nemmouche, who killed four people at Jewish Museum in Brussels, as well as the two suspected terrorists shot dead by Belgian Police in the eastern town of Verviers.

Abdelhamid Abaaoud, one of the planners of the November 2015 terrorist attacks in Paris, was — like many terrorists in Europe — from Molenbeek, Belgium.

These no-go zones, right under the noses of law enforcement agencies, provide terrorists with the opportunity to flourish — and then all asylum seekers have to face the accusation of being suspected terrorists.

The town administrators and the residents of such dark areas, who largely come from an immigrant background, are also to be blamed for presence of such criminal activity in these localities. Because they themselves either sympathize or keep their eyes shut, despite knowing what goes on around them.

European governments have clearly failed to enact strong measures to deal with the danger they were facing. Warnings even intensified after the terror attacks in France and the mass sexual assaults of women by asylum seekers who had mostly slipped illegally into Europe from North Africa and Middle East.

Anis Amri was also such a criminal. He had spent four consecutive years in six prisons in Sicily, Italy, but authorities seemed not to realize the danger he posed. Even in Germany, he would deceive the law enforcement agencies with aliases and fake documents, and by exploiting the insufficient access German authorities seem to have to the overall backgrounds of suspects.

It seems time to take these petty criminals seriously when it comes to dealing with the problem of terrorism, as many of those being allured by the jihadist organizations have a background of small scale crimes.

Amri’s case again puts spotlight on the link between terrorism and the criminal background of the “youths” who join the band wagon of organizations like Islamic State.

Whipped up by extremists, intoxicated by ancient conspiracy theories that Muslims are facing “crusades” by the Christian world and the Jewish Israel, many confused Muslim youths are unable to realize that they are doing more damage to Islam and Muslims by committing such horrible crimes.

Such people, drunk on propaganda, claim to be the “representatives of the Muslims,” thereby putting the credibility of the whole community in question.

Europe was not blindfolded when its leaders invited in so many migrants from the Middle East amidst Syrian conflict; they already knew the risks involved in letting so many people into their countries. Yet many countries, such as Germany, went beyond the call of duty to help victims of the war.

Germany welcomed more refugees than any other nation (ca. 1 million) despite the warnings from their law enforcement agencies that terrorists were also entering Europe among the massive influx of migrants.

The mindset of the extremists in Muslim world that the “crusaders” are threatening them by invading their countries and looting their resources, is one of the biggest hurdles in the way of a campaign to avoid war and colonialism — a “peace campaign” being strenuously promoted in Europe, the US and elsewhere.

The critics of Western Muslims accuse them of lacking empathy towards the victims of Islamic terrorists and a failure to show adequate disassociation from that lot.

Many people across the US and Europe stood by the Muslims when they thought that this minority might be treated less than fairly by Donald Trump who, when he was campaigning, said that he wanted to ensure that Muslims entering the United States should be vetted to make certain they were not terrorists.

People in the US-organized protest rallies in support of Muslims; and Jews, about whom we often speak — unfairly — in disparaging terms, promised to register as Muslims if Trump tried to setup a special entry register for Muslim immigrants.

Student groups organized a human chain of solidarity to secure the Muslim students in the University of Michigan when they wanted to offer prayers in open grounds.

This is just one example of living together where all people from different social backgrounds are willing to stand by each other in the hour of need. Now if some rigid Muslim extremists are determined to kill our fellow citizens or impose their understanding of religion on everyone, and we do not take a fair stand against this, then that criminal silence also makes us accomplices in this injustice.

The Muslims would do well to bear the responsibility of showing solidarity with those who lose their lives in terrorist attacks committed by Islamists and with anyone who is hit by the inhumane acts of these terrorists. The time has come for all of us to understand that cheerleading for the killers is what encourages even more people to join the ranks of terrorism.

Keeping a strict check on extremist organizations and their operations would be needed through more intelligence gathering on their activities if they are related to loyalty and commitment to their own community or ethnic group rather than to society as a whole, and we should do that without discriminating against any religion or political belief.

Both governments and communities will have to put curbs on clergy who exploit Muslim youths by promising them a trip to paradise after committing mass murders.

Regimes such as Saudi Arabia and Iran might be spearheading such extremist campaigns with the design of gaining some political mileage and imposing their mindset on other countries or regions.

We need to send a loud message to terrorists, who are exploiting the name of Islam by unleashing terror against people of different faiths, and clearly state that we Muslims will have nothing to do with them.

Time has come for those who are still confused about the acts of these terrorists – or those who serve as terrorist apologists to try to cover up their deeds after every incident – to be exposed. A large number of Muslims are already sick and tired of these extremists.

We Muslims also need to leave no stone unturned to return the humane gestures that our fellow citizens have shown when we Muslims faced trouble.

In the same way they took to the streets for us, it is now our turn to show all our fellow citizens– non-Muslims as well as Muslims – that we also stand by them. Merry Christmas!!!

Khadija Khan is a Pakistan-based journalist and commentator.

Muslim Arab Offers Cash Reward for Capture of Tel Aviv Terrorist

A Muslim Arab from Jerusalem has joined the search for Nashat Milhem, who shot two Israeli civilians to death in Tel Aviv on Friday and wounded another seven.


Israel police, aided by IDF soldiers and volunteers, are still conducting a large-scale manhunt after Nashat Milhem, the Israeli Arab terrorist who killed two and injured seven in a Tel Aviv shooting attack on New Year’s Day.

A Muslim Arab from Jerusalem has also joined the efforts to capture Milhem. Mazen Qaq, who acts as the chairman of the Committee of Jerusalem’s Old City Merchants, has offered a substantial cash reward for any viable information which could lead to Melhem’s capture.

“If I saw him today I would capture him myself, or at least do whatever it takes for him to be captured,” Qaq told the Israeli press on Tuesday.It is suspected that Milhem has fled to Palestinian Authority-administered territory in Judea and Samaria. Police announced earlier in the day that Tel Aviv residents can calm down regarding the danger posed by Milhem, who is likely armed and could strike again. “As of this morning, the tension in Gush Dan [Tel Aviv district] can be significantly reduced,” Police Commissioner Roni Alsheich stated.

Qaq, who is willing to pay $10,000 of his own money as a reward, said he considers himself to be an Israeli Arab, rather than a Palestinian, and that he represents many Arab business owners in Jerusalem.

“We need to stop with the ‘Arab against Israeli’ narrative. We are all cousins who wish to live in peace,” said Qaq. “This is a man who acted against citizens of Israel, I will not let a man like that destroy our security and our mutual trust.”

Qaq explained that he was motivated to take this action out of the need to restore the trust and close relations between Israeli Arabs and Israeli Jews, which, according to him, have been damaged by the recent wave of terrorism.

However, not everyone is enthusiastic about Qaq’s award initiative. “Whoever is offering money, or whatever initiative someone has taken, is completely irrelevant to the operation,” Chief Inspector Micky Rosenfeld, the Israel police foreign press spokesman, told Tazpit Press Service (TPS).

“We are working on an operational level and on an intelligence level for a realistic solution,” Rosenfeld stated.

By: United with Israel Staff and Michael Zeff, TPS

Translate »
Skip to toolbar