Ikinyoma cyo gutina Foster Gen.Ogola Francis cyamenyekanye!

Ikinyoma cyo gutina Foster Gen.Ogola Francis cyamenyekanye!

  Umugabo mukuru w’ingabo za Kenya Gen. Ogola Francis ku wa kane yitabye Imana azize impanuka italimo kuvugwaho rumwe na batavuga rumwe n’ubutegetsi (oppositions) Azimio La Umoja One Kenya Coalition.Basabye Leta ya More »

Foolish people, foolish government. Abantu bibigoryi, n’ubutegetsi bw’ibibigoryi!!!

Foolish people, foolish government. Abantu bibigoryi, n’ubutegetsi bw’ibibigoryi!!!

Birashoboka yuko umuntu ashobora kuba afite uburwayi bukomeye isi itari yasobanukirwa, mu bisanzwe ubundi umuntu wese arushwa no gushaka kumenya akibazo afite kugirango ashakishe umuti wicyo kibazo.Nyuma yo kumenya ikibazo no gushakisha More »

Museveni na Kayumba Nyamwasa balimo kwirebera mu ndorerwamo

Museveni na Kayumba Nyamwasa balimo kwirebera mu ndorerwamo

  April 17,2024 ibiro ntaramakuru byo mu ijuru (Heaven News Media Agency) biratangaza Amakuru akurikira. Mu ijoro ryakeye Kampala muri Uganda bakoranye inama na Kayumba Nyamwasa, bamubwira ko adakwiye gutaha amanitse amaboko More »

The Destruction of Iran’s Terrorist Hub in Damascus Was Entirely Justified

The Destruction of Iran’s Terrorist Hub in Damascus Was Entirely Justified

The bombing of the Iranian consulate in Damascus, Syria was not, as the Iranians claim, simply an attack on a blameless diplomatic mission. It was a carefully targeted strike on the headquarters More »

European Union: Testing Election Ahead

European Union: Testing Election Ahead

Instead of moving towards a European super-state or a federal outfit, the EU’s current trajectory seems to be back to the nation-state model. The coming European Parliament elections will show whether that More »

 

Léotard demande la levée du secret défense.

June 19, 2017   Uncategorized   No comments

France – Génocide des Tutsis au Rwanda : François Léotard demande la levée du secret défense.

L’ex-ministre français, François Léotard. © AFP

 François Léotard, ex-ministre français de la Défense au moment du génocide des Tutsis au Rwanda en 1994, s’est prononcé en faveur de la levée du secret défense des archives, au cours d’un colloque organisé par l’association RBF France – Forum de la mémoire. Il a en outre reconnu que l’opération turquoise avait pour objectif de soutenir les Forces armées rwandaises.

C’est la surprise d’un débat très attendu. François Léotard, ministre français de la Défense au moment du génocide des Tutsis au Rwanda en 1994, s’est prononcé pour la levée du secret défense sur les archives de l’armée française à cette époque.

 

“Nous pouvons aller le demander à [Jean-Yves] Le Drian “, l’actuel ministre français de la Défense, a-t-il même proposé à Bernard Kouchner, ancien ministre français des Affaires étrangères, à qui il était opposé.

Le statut d’ancien ministre de la Défense ne confère aucun pouvoir particulier à Léotard pour obtenir cette décision. Mais il donne un poids particulier à une demande qui était, jusque-là, portée par des associations et ONG, notamment de rescapés, critiques du rôle de l’armée Française au Rwanda en 1994. Il est le premier haut responsable français de l’époque à s’exprimer en ce sens.

 

“Je joindrais mes efforts, bien sûr aux victimes, aux enfants et parents de victimes, mais aussi à toutes les associations qui le souhaitent, pour que toutes les archives soient ouvertes, publiées, a-t-il précisé devant des journalistes au sortir du débat. Nous avons déjà les archives du conseil restreint de l’Élysée. C’est à mon avis une grande première dans l’histoire politique française. Il faut également celles du ministère de la Défense, celles des instructions qui ont été données aux unités. Je les assume, encore une fois (…) Mais je ne laisserai jamais ternir la réputation d’une force militaire qui s’est trouvée engagée toute seule […] dans une opération extrêmement délicate, qui a sauvé des dizaines de milliers de vies humaines.”

 

Interrogé sur les objectifs militaires de la controversée opération française turquoise, il a reconnu un “soutien lié par les accords que la France avait passé et qui consistait tout simplement à faire en sorte que ne s’effondre pas la force qu’on considérait comme la force principale à l’époque – […] les forces armées rwandaises -, qui si elle s’effondrait, donnerait immédiatement naissance […] à des violences et des massacres. C’est exactement ce qui s’est passé”, ajoutant qu’à l’époque, Paris était “inquiet de l’éventuelle prise de Kigali”.

 

Pour le reste, les positions des deux têtes d’affiche ont été conformes aux convictions qu’on leur connaissait. Kouchner a été le procureur prudent de l’action de la France au Rwanda, évoquant “une très grande faute politique” et déclarant encore que “laisser passer le gouvernement génocidaire [au Zaïre], c’était difficile à avaler”.

 

Quand à Léotard, qui faisait face à un public globalement hostile dans une salle pleine, il a campé sur ses positions (“je défendrai mon pays, sur ce sujet-là comme sur d’autres”, a-t-il affirmé) même si ses diverses déclarations ont parfois semblé contradictoires. Ainsi, après avoir en préambule assumé toute la responsabilité de la controversée opération militaro-humanitaire turquoise (“l’opération turquoise, c’est moi”, a-t-il déclaré), il a affirmé avoir été “un des rares” à avoir émis des réserves sur cette opération. L’ancien ministre a en outre conseillé la lecture du “professeur [Bernard] Lugan”, historien d’extrême droite aux thèses très contestées sur le génocide (qui affirme, par exemple, que celui-ci n’a pas été planifié).

 

France – Génocide des Tutsis au Rwanda : François Léotard demande la levée du secret défense

 


Read More

Lebanon, Christians, Under Islamist Threat by Shadi Khalloul

June 19, 2017   Uncategorized   No comments
  • Islamic jihadist groups are threatening Lebanese Christians and demanding that they submit to Islam. Lebanon’s Christians, descendants of Aramaic Syriacs, were the majority in the country a mere 100 years ago.
  • Saad Hariri, a Sunni Muslim politician supported by Saudi Arabia, has invited every Lebanese party to his office to sign a document confirming that Lebanon is an Arab state. This is clearly intended to turn Lebanon into yet another officially Arab Muslim state.
  • The next step will be to ask that the constitution of Lebanon be changed so that the country be ruled by Sharia law, as with many other Arab and Islamic states, including the Palestinian Authority (PA). The PA constitution declares: “The principles of Islamic Sharia shall be the main source of legislation.”

Recent upheavals in Lebanon are making local Christians communities worry about their existence as heirs and descendants of the first Christians. Christians in the Middle East now are facing a huge genocide — similar to the Christian genocide the followed the Islamic conquest of the Middle East in the 7th century A.D.

Islamic jihadist groups are threatening Lebanese Christians and demanding that they submit to Islam. Lebanon’s Christians, descendants of Aramaic Syriacs, were the majority in the country a mere 100 years ago.

The demand for Christians to convert to Islam was one of the declarations issued by ISIS and other Islamic groups hiding in the mountainous border between Syria and Lebanon.

Saad Hariri, a Saudi-backed Sunni Muslim politician and the son of assassinated Prime Minister Rafik Hariri, recently invited every Lebanese party to his office to sign a document confirming that Lebanon is an Arab state. Arab state equals Islamic laws, as with all members of the Arab League. Why is it so important to Hariri or to the Sunni and Islamic world to include Lebanon as an Arab state and cancel its current name as a Lebanese state only?

And why do the Arab states, including the Palestinian Authority (PA), refuse to recognize Israel, with its 80% Jewish majority, as Jewish state, while at the same time trying to impose the definition of an Arab state on Lebanon, whose population is 35% non-Arab Christians?

There are approximately one million Syriac Maronites left in Lebanon, as well as another 700,000 Christians belonging to other churches. In addition, more than eight million Syriac Maronites live in the diaspora. These eight million Christians fled over the centuries because of persecution by Muslims, often conquerors of the Christian homeland. Lebanon was never a strictly Arab or Muslim. But that is the step that Saad Hariri, as a milder face of the expansionist ISIS ideology, would have us take — under the guise of a modern, moderate, Sunni secular front.

Saad Hariri, a Saudi-backed Sunni Muslim politician in Lebanon, recently invited every Lebanese party to his office to sign a document confirming that Lebanon is an Arab state. Pictured above: Saad Hariri (right) with the late Saudi King Abdullah (left) in 2014.

Hariri’s request revels what the Islamic world is planning for Lebanon, Israel and eventually Europe and the United States. World powers need to protect Christian, Jewish and other minorities in Middle East. Both Lebanon and Israel must remain homelands for persecuted minorities in Middle East — a Christian homeland in Lebanon and a Jewish homeland in Israel — connected to each other geographically, assisting each other economically, and perhaps soon with a peace agreement that could form a peaceful bridge in culture and human rights between the West and the East.

Bashir Gemayel, the great Christian Maronite Lebanese leader who was assassinated after being elected president in 1982, warned the West during Lebanese Civil War that if the Islamic forces fighting against Christians win, they would continue to the Western World, as they are, in fact, doing at present.

This agreement for an Arab Lebanese state being requested by the Sunni leadership is clearly intended to turn Lebanon into yet another officially Arab Muslim state. It aims to negate the rights of the original people in the land, just as the original Christian Copts of Egypt have been overrun, and the Aramaic Syriac Christians of Iraq have been overrun. In Lebanon, the original people of the land are the Aramaic-Phoenician Christians — especially the Maronites — who still preserve Syriac (the language Jesus spoke) as their sacred language. A full 95% of Lebanese villages are still called by Syriac Aramaic names. Islam and the Arabic language came to Lebanon late from Arabian Peninsula, after the seventh century.

Hariri’s wished-for step might also be supported by the Shiite Muslim party of Hizballah: both the Sunnis and the Shiites are Islamic. The next step will be to ask that the constitution of Lebanon be changed so that the land of the cedars is ruled by Sharia law, as with many other Islamic states, including the Palestinian Authority. Article 4 in the constitution of the future Palestinian state clearly notes: “The principles of Islamic Sharia shall be the main source of legislation.”

Implementing Islamic Sharia law means having Muslim sovereignty and control over the Aramaic Christian community.

If this Islamic ideology, implemented by so many countries, is not racism, then what is racism?

Why does the free world, including the churches and secular Western leaders, keep silent and demonize only Jewish Israel for protecting itself from the same threat and ideology?

“Speak the truth and the truth will set you free.” The Christians of Lebanon and entire Middle East can save their existence only by adopting this sacred sentence.

Shadi Khalloul, Chairman of the Aramaic Christian Association in Israel, is a representative of Israel’s Arabic-speaking Christians and a candidate for parliament in Israel.

Read More

Laundering Iran’s Nukes by A.J. Caschetta

June 19, 2017   Uncategorized   No comments

  • What remains unknown is why President Obama and most of his party want a nuclear Iran.

  • The goals of the diplomatic process have changed tremendously from the beginning, when President Obama regularly claimed that an Iranian nuclear weapon is “unacceptable,” and that only his unique brand of personal diplomacy could prevent it. Rather than “prevent” or “block” Iran from acquiring a nuclear bomb, as the president and Secretary of State Kerry falsely claim, the deal assures Iran of legally acquiring one.

  • By weaponizing its nuclear program, Iran has violated every agreement it has signed. Iran’s illegal nuclear weapons program is being cleansed and validated at the behest of the Obama administration. These terms make the JCPOA deal unknowable. Signing it is not an act of diplomacy; it is surrender.

  • There is only one flaw in the JCPOA laundering scheme. In a true money-laundering scheme that involves an outlaw and a legitimate party, the money launderer receives a fee for the service provided; in this trade, the U.S. gets nothing from the JCPOA. The U.S. does not even get back one of the Americans held hostage by Iran.

Let’s come clean. Let’s finally recognize the so-called Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) for what it is — a laundering project designed to legitimize Iran’s nuclear weapons program.

Like a money-laundering scheme by which illegally-earned or stolen money is cleansed or laundered through a legitimate business, Iran’s illegal nuclear weapons program is being cleansed and validated before the world’s eyes at the behest of the Obama administration.

The goals of the diplomatic process have changed tremendously from the beginning when President Obama regularly claimed that an Iranian nuclear weapon is “unacceptable” and that only his unique brand of personal diplomacy could prevent it.

But now, even the most generous (or naive) reading of the deal acknowledges that, at best, it delays an Iranian nuclear weapon by 10 to 15 years, after which the Islamic Republic of Iran emerges with a full-blown legal nuclear weapons program. Rather than “prevent” or “block” Iran from acquiring a nuclear bomb, as the president and Secretary of State John Kerry falsely claim, the deal assures Iran of legally acquiring one. It is like telling a jewel thief caught red-handed that if he stops stealing jewels for 15 years, all charges against him will be dropped and he can keep his ill-gotten booty.

Although much of the public debate has centered on the details of the restrictions that will be dropped in 2030, many people believe that Iran will cheat on the deal. And since the ultimate arbiter of Iran’s compliance with the JCPOA will be the United Nations, it is fair to assume that its record of failure will continue. This seems very probable, as it is Iran that will present much of the evidence to “prove” that it is in compliance.

Regrettably, since the beginning of the century, when Mohammad ElBaradei was the Director General of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), Iran has made significant advancesin its covert, illicit nuclear program.

As Iran played cat-and-mouse games with the inspections, ElBaradei studiously avoidedconfronting the regime and soft-pedaled its violations of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. For this work, ElBaradei was awarded a Nobel Peace Prize.

Some critics of the deal cite Ronald Reagan’s advice to “trust but verify.” However, the verification process involves a 24-day waiting period between requesting an inspection and gaining access to an Iranian nuclear site.

Some commentators are placated by the claims of Secretary of Energy and Obama diplomat Ernest Moniz that 24 days is insufficient to hide the kinds of work that Iran has agreed to halt. But after first learning that only IAEA inspectors will be allowed to inspect sites, it was revealed that none of them will be Americans, and we have now learned that only Iranian inspectors will be allowed at crucial military sites such as the Parchin complex. That looks like too much trust and too little verification.

Another objection often cited is that no one, including John Kerry and Ernest Moniz, even knows what the JCPOA is. The exact contents of the JCPOA deal remains a mystery, much like the fictitious fatwa banning nuclear weapons that was allegedly issued by Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and is frequently cited by Obama — yet has been seen by no one. Parts of the JCPOA are hidden, not only from the public, but even from American diplomats, as Susan Rice, the U.S. Ambassador to the UN, admits. Ernest Moniz dismisses our willful ignorance of the JCPOA’s terms as standard operating procedure, and John Kerry says we must respect the process that allows the IAEA and Iran to have secret side deals undisclosed to any of the P5+1 signatories. But these terms make the JCPOA deal unknowable. Signing it is not an act of diplomacy; it is surrender.

Iran acquired nuclear technology in 1957 through the U.S. Atoms for Peace program. Recipients of the Eisenhower Administration’s nuclear largesse were required to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), which is regularly updated with various safeguards andprotocols.

By weaponizing its nuclear program, Iran has violated every agreement it has signed.

The JCPOA is rewarding these violations. It also signals to all countries, good and bad, that now is the time to break treaties with the U.S., when the likelihood of a serious response is low or absent altogether. Surely Iran’s leaders have noticed the U.S. response to Russia’sviolations of the Budapest Memorandum, its invasion of Ukraine and the Crimea and its movesin the Arctic Circle. Surely, they have also noticed the U.S. response to China’s construction of islands that are military bases throughout the South China Sea.

So while it is unlikely that Iran will suffer any consequences for cheating (assuming the U.S. even learns of any offenses), there is almost no reason to cheat. The terms of the JCPOA are so one-sided that soon Iran will emerge with all the nuclear weapons it wants, as well as intercontinental ballistic missiles to deliver them to the “Great Satan”. And then it will be too late.

There is only one flaw in the JCPOA laundering scheme. In a true money-laundering scheme that involves an outlaw and a legitimate party, the money launderer receives a fee for the service provided; in this trade, the U.S. earns nothing from the JCPOA. The U.S. does not even get back one of the Americans held hostage by Iran. Iran will not admit to any culpability for murdering Americans around the globe, much less pay reparations for them.

There has not even been a perfunctory, empty promise to cease funding terrorist groups andthreatening genocide against Israel and America.

Iran’s Foreign Minister and chief nuclear negotiator, Javad Zarif (left), is very, very pleased with the recent nuclear deal. Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei (right), is not unclenching Iran’s fist in its relations with the West.

It is hard not to conclude that the JCPOA was designed from the beginning to ensure that Iran would get a legitimate nuclear weapons program, confirmed with the imprimatur of the United States and the United Nations. What remains unknown is why the president and most of his party want a nuclear Iran.

 

Read More

Kuwa 24th kanama 2014 njyanwa mu iyerekwa,mbona ihuriro nyarwanda RNC.

June 19, 2017   Uncategorized   No comments

Kuwa 24th kanama 2014 njyanwa mu iyerekwa,mbona ihuriro nyarwanda rya politike Rwanda Congress RNC,rihamagaza inama yigitaraganya yabanyamakuru bigenga batavuga rumwe na leta ya Kigali,iyo nama yaberaga mu gihugu ntabashije kumenya.

Kuwa 24th kanama 2014 njyanwa mu iyerekwa,mbona ihuriro nyarwanda rya politike Rwanda Congress RNC,rihamagaza inama yigitaraganya yabanyamakuru bigenga batavuga rumwe na leta ya Kigali,iyo nama yaberaga mu gihugu ntabashije kumenya.

Nerekwa abanyamakuru bihuriro nyarwanda aribo bakora umulimo wa protocol wokwakira abandi banyamakuru bagenzia babo,ibyari kumurongo w’ibyigwa kwari ukurebera hamwe uburyo abanyamakuru batavuga rumwe n’ubutegetsi ariko na none bakaba barimo ibice bitandukanye biteye n’inyungu z’Abanyapolitike bakorana nabo.

Maze kugirango hatungwanywe uburyo bwo kunoza imikorere namashyaka atavuga rumwe na leta y’Urwanda bareke guhangana kandi bose umwanzi wabo ar’umwe.

Mbona ishyaka RNC riteguye iyo nama yahuje abanyamakuru bose baba abo mubihugu byo Muburayi cyangwa abo muri America,cyangwa se abari kumugabane wa Asia bose bahurira hamwe maze bitabira inama yabanyamakuru kugirango bandike kimwe bavuge rumwe.

Ariko murundi ruhande ihuriro nyarwanda ryashakaga kureba uburyo ryabonana nabanyamakuru bakomeye mu mwuga w’itangaza-makuru bakaba ntakuntu bahura nabo usibye gusa gutegura iyo nama iri kurwego mpunza mahanga kugirango barebere hamwe uburyo babona noneho babaganirize barebe uko bakorana nabo.

Nabonaga bamwe mubanyamakuru baza muri iyo nama nta nibikoresho by’itangaza-makuru babaga bafite ariko nyine bagakora iyo bwabaga bagakora umulimo wabo neza yeg muburyo budakwiye ariko umulimo ugakorwa.

Read More

Kuwa 19th kanama 2014,njyanwa mu iyerekwa ubwo nalimvuye kumulimo w’Uwiteka,nerekwa imyuka (2);y’inzigo iturutse ku nkiko z’igihugu muburengera-zuba bw’igihugu ,mbona iyo myuka y’inzigo yambutse umupaka uhana imbibi na Congo ahitwa Igoma.

June 19, 2017   Uncategorized   No comments

Kuwa 19th kanama 2014,njyanwa mu iyerekwa ubwo nalimvuye kumulimo w’Uwiteka,nerekwa imyuka (2);y’inzigo iturutse ku nkiko z’igihugu muburengera-zuba bw’igihugu ,mbona iyo myuka y’inzigo yambutse umupaka uhana imbibi na Congo ahitwa Igoma.

Nerekwa umuhanuzi mukuru ari imbere y’uwo mwuka w’inzigo,maze mbona bambutse umuharuro uhuza uRwagasabo na Congo,bamaze kugera kubutaka bw’Urwagasabo,mbona haje umuhanuzi-kazi w’ibinyoma aza gutera ubwoba umuhanuzi mukuru ko,arimo guhigwa ashakishwa kugirango acibwe igihana.

Uyu ni wa mugabo witwa Rupfu.

 

Ntangazwa ni uko umuhanuzi mukuru ntacyo abyitayeho,cyangwa ngo bimutere ubwoba,ibyo yaramaze guhanura bihinduka ubusa kuko ibyo yabikoreye kuri telephone agira ngo ntawumubona kubwamahirwe macye akubitana n’umuhanuzi mukuru aho yari yihishe maze ubuhanuzi bwe buhinduka impfabusa.

Uwo mwuka w’inzika umaze gukandagira kubutaka bw’Urwagasabo,mbona abanyarwanda bakwiye imishwaro barahunze bajyanwa mu ishuli aho bazajya kwiga igihe gito nyuma bazagaruka kumirenge tabo.Nerekwa bageze ku kibuga cy’ishuli mbona barateranye bahabwa amabwiriza ajyanye nayabanyeshuli.

Mbona umuhanuzi mukuru araje azanye nabakuru b’umuryango w’impunzi HCR,baza baje kureba abo banyeshuli ngo babahe ibyangombwa byose bisabwa kuba umunyeshuli ngo abe abyujuje,numva bavuga ko,harekuwe milliyari 21 z’Amanyarwanda zigomba guhabwa abo banyeshuli,nuko mbona yuko abanyarwanda barwaniye umwanya w’ubukuru wokuyobora abo banyeshuli kugirango babashe kwiba ayo mamiliyali yamafaranga yagenewe abo banyeshuli.

Ariko mbona uwo mwanya uhawe umwe mu bantu b’imfura y’inyangamugayo maze abarwaniaraga uwo mwanya bose baburiramo,nyuma yo kurwanira uwo mwanya ishuli ryahise rirangira abantu basubira kumirenge yabo aho bari batuye,icyo cyari igice kimwe.

Ndebye IKUSI,mbona banyampinga nabo bafite ishuli ryabo aho bari bateraniye,mbona ibinyabiziga byinshi bigemurira abo banyampinga ingemu ifite ikinegu cyo gukiranirwa,mu gihe ngitangajwe nibyo!Mbona umuhanuzi mukuru araje,abanyabiziga bamubonye bahita bose barahunga.

Mbona yinjiye mu ishuli abazaniye inkwi kugirango bazajye bitegurira ibifungurwa kugirango bareke kurya ingemu iriho gukiranirwa,ariko hagati muri banyampinga  mbona babajwe ni uko umuhanuzi mukuru yinjiye mu kigo cy’ishuli akababuza umudendezo wabo,ndetse nabanyabiziga nabo ni uko bahise barakara ko babujijwe umudendezo w’ibyaha bikoreraga ntawubakoma mu nko nkora.

Ndebye ibumoso bwanjye mbona umwe mu bantu bahora bakurikirana ibihanurwa,uko bishyizwe agaragara ahita akoporora agatwara ubwo buhanuzi icyo abukoresha ntumbaze!Mbona ubu buhanuzi nshyizeho uyu munsi ko yarabukeneye cyane kugirango amenye ibigiye gukurikira.

Ariko numva ko,ngo iyo bamaze kubuna ubuhanuzi,bahita bahimba amayeri yokuburwanya,cyangwa babwifashisha muri gahunda zabo kuko baba bamaze kumenya ibigiye gukulikiraho,ibyo nabyo byarantangaje ariko kandi nsanga ar’ubusa kuko niba udashobora gukora icyo usabwa gukora,ahubwo ugakora ibinyuranye n’ubuhanuzi,ukabwifashisha muri gahunda zawe zo gukiranirwa birumvikana neza yuko ntakabuza umujinya w’Uwiteka ntuzabura kwaka hejuru y’ubugingo bwawe.

Ubwo ndakomeza nsa nk’ugana muburasira-zuba,ngera ku nzu y’etage,nyinjiramo mbona ndi kumwe n’umugabo muremure wari imbere yanjye witwa Rupfu,uyu mugabo ni mure mure cyane afite nka metero 2½ ,nigikara afite amaso atukura,n’umugome cyane,nta rukundo agira cyangwa amaranga mutima,mbona yinjiye muri iyo nzu y’Etage muri kave hasi,nanjye ndamukurikira tugeze hasi cyane mbona yinjiye mu biro bishinzwe gutanga impapuro zimuhesha uburenganzira bwo gutwara abantu bageze igihe cyo gusarurwa ngo bakurwe mu isi yabazima.

Mbona yicaranye n’umuhanuzi mukuru muri ibyo biro,ubwo njyewe nari kumuryango ndi gukurikirana ibyo barimo bakora,ngira ikizere gikomeye ko,umuhanuzi mukuru arikumwe na rupfu kandi ko,nta cyo ashobora gukora arikumwe n’umuhanuzi mukuru,mbona ahawe urwandiko rumuhesha uburenganzira bwo gutwara abantu bagiye gukurwa mu isi cyane cyane ko yabwiwe ko ,agomba guhera mu rwagasabo.

Mbabazwa ni uko umuhanuzi mukuru nawe yabyemeje aho kugirango abyange mbona ahubwo arabyishimiye,bona rupfu yakaba uko yabaye uko,arasohotse anezerewe ameze nk’imbwa yibye inyama,ubwo ndababara nanirwa kubaza umuhanuzi mukuru icyamuteye gushyigikira rupfu ngo ahabwe uburenganzira bwo gutwara abantu bacu tugenda tutavugana turinda dutandukana.

Bene data Uwiteka abakomeze kandi Imana yo mu ijuru ikiranuka muri byose ikomeze kubagirira neza,ibiteho,abataha muzasuhurize abatubanhirije uhereye 1959,1973,1994,ubwo igihe nigihumuza natwe tuzabasanga tunezerannywe hamwe n’Umwami wacu Yesu kristo wapfuye akazuka mubapfuye ubu akaba ar’iburyo bw’Uwiteka Imana yacu.Bye bye.

Read More
« Older posts
Newer posts »
Skip to toolbar