Umwakagara Paul Kagame: Imana twayirashe ijisho rimwe ubwo twari kumulindi wa Byumba

Umwakagara Paul Kagame: Imana twayirashe ijisho rimwe ubwo twari kumulindi wa Byumba

Inkuru dukesha ijwi ry’America (VOA) yemeza ibimenyetso by’Ubuhanuzi twanditse taliki ya 20 April, 2024 ubu Buhanuzi bufite umutwe wa magambo ugira uti «amarembera y’ihirima ry’umwana w’unwega UMWAKAGARA PAUL KAGAME» ubu buhanuzi bulimo More »

Ikinyoma cyo guhitana Foster Gen.Ogola Francis cyamenyekanye!

Ikinyoma cyo guhitana Foster Gen.Ogola Francis cyamenyekanye!

  Umugabo mukuru w’ingabo za Kenya Gen. Ogola Francis ku wa kane yitabye Imana azize impanuka italimo kuvugwaho rumwe na batavuga rumwe n’ubutegetsi (oppositions) Azimio La Umoja One Kenya Coalition.Basabye Leta ya More »

Foolish people, foolish government. Abantu bibigoryi, n’ubutegetsi bw’ibibigoryi!!!

Foolish people, foolish government. Abantu bibigoryi, n’ubutegetsi bw’ibibigoryi!!!

Birashoboka yuko umuntu ashobora kuba afite uburwayi bukomeye isi itari yasobanukirwa, mu bisanzwe ubundi umuntu wese arushwa no gushaka kumenya akibazo afite kugirango ashakishe umuti wicyo kibazo.Nyuma yo kumenya ikibazo no gushakisha More »

Museveni na Kayumba Nyamwasa balimo kwirebera mu ndorerwamo

Museveni na Kayumba Nyamwasa balimo kwirebera mu ndorerwamo

  April 17,2024 ibiro ntaramakuru byo mu ijuru (Heaven News Media Agency) biratangaza Amakuru akurikira. Mu ijoro ryakeye Kampala muri Uganda bakoranye inama na Kayumba Nyamwasa, bamubwira ko adakwiye gutaha amanitse amaboko More »

The Destruction of Iran’s Terrorist Hub in Damascus Was Entirely Justified

The Destruction of Iran’s Terrorist Hub in Damascus Was Entirely Justified

The bombing of the Iranian consulate in Damascus, Syria was not, as the Iranians claim, simply an attack on a blameless diplomatic mission. It was a carefully targeted strike on the headquarters More »

 

Muslim Invasion of Europe by Guy Millière

  • The Syrian government sells passports and birth certificates at affordable prices. Many migrants have no passport, no ID, and refuse to give fingerprints.

  • Because Islam is the heart of the culture of people formerly colonized, Europeans rejected criticism of Islam, saying it would blend smoothly into a multicultural Europe. They did not demand the assimilation of the Muslims who came to live in Europe. Much of the time, Muslims are not assimilated — and often show signs of not wanting to assimilate.

  • Any criticism of Islam in Europe is treated as a form of racism, and “Islamophobia” is considered a crime or a sign of mental illness.

  • European people still have the right to vote, but are deprived of most of their power: all important political decisions in Europe are made behind closed doors by technocrats and professional politicians in Brussels or Strasbourg.

  • Europe has renounced force, so to many, it appears weak, vulnerable and easily able to be overpowered.

  • The sudden arrival of hundreds of thousands more Muslims most likely prompts Europeans to think that the nightmare will get worse; they see, powerlessly, that their leaders speak and act as if they have no awareness of what is happening.

  • Central European leaders and people, who have already lived under authoritarian rule, seem to be thinking that entering the European Union was a huge mistake. They came to what was then called the “free world.” They do not seem willing to be subjected again to coercive decisions made by outsiders.

  • Illegal Muslim migrants will live on social benefits until the bankruptcy of welfare states.

  • In all 28 countries of the European Union, birth rates are low and the population is aging. People under thirty account for only 16% of the population, or 80 million people. In the 22 Arab countries, plus Turkey and Iran, people under thirty account for 70% of the population, or 350 million people.

The flow of illegal migrants does not stop. They land on the Greek islands along the Turkish coast. They still try to get into Hungary, despite a razor wire fence and mobilized army. Their destination is Germany or Scandinavia, sometimes France or the UK. Some of them still arrive from Libya. Since the beginning of January, more than 620,000 have arrived by sea alone. There will undoubtedly be many more: a leaked secret document estimates that by the end of December, there might be 1.5 million.

Journalists in Western Europe continue to depict them as “refugees” fleeing war in Syria. The description is false. According to statistics released by the European Union, only twenty-five percent of them come from Syria; the true number is probably lower. The Syrian government sells passports and birth certificates at affordable prices. The vast majority of migrants come from other countries: Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, Eritrea, Somalia, and Nigeria.

Many do not seem to have left in a hurry. Many bring new high-end smartphones and large sums of cash, ten or twenty thousand euros, sometimes more. Many have no passports, no ID, and refuse to give fingerprints.

Whenever people flee to survive, the men come with whole families: women, children, elders. Here, instead, more than 75% of those who arrive are men under 50; few are women, children or elders.

As Christians are now the main targets of Islamists (the Jews fled or were forced out decades ago), the people escaping the war in Syria should be largely composed of Christians. But Christians are a small minority among those who arrive, and they often hide that they are Christians.

Those who enter Europe are almost all Muslims, and behave as some Muslims often do in the Muslim world: they harass Christians and attack women. In reception centers, harassing Christians and attacking women are workaday incidents. European women and girls who live near reception centers are advised to take care and cover up. Rapes, assaults, stabbings and other crimes are on the rise.

Western European political leaders could tell the truth and act accordingly. They do not. They talk of “solidarity,” “humanitarian duty,” “compassion.” From the beginning, Chancellor Angela Merkel of Germany said that illegal migrants were welcome: she seemed to change her mind for a moment, but quickly slid back. In France, President François Hollande says the same things as Angela Merkel.

After the heartbreaking image of a dead child being carried on a Turkish beach was published, thousands of Germans and French initially spoke the same way as their leaders. Their enthusiasm seems to have faded fast.

The people of Central Europe were not enthusiastic from the beginning. Their leaders seem to share the feelings of their populations. None spoke as explicitly as Viktor Orbán, Prime Minister of Hungary. He said out loud what many of his countrymen seemed to think. He spoke of “invasion” and asked if there were another word to describe the massive and often brutal entry into a country of people who have not been invited to do so. He added that a country has theright to decide who is allowed to enter its territory and to guard its borders. He stressed that those who enter Europe are from a “different culture,” and suggested that Islam might not be compatible with European Judeo-Christian values.

Western European political leaders harshly condemned his remarks and the attitude of Central Europe in general. They decided to take a hard line approach, including: forcing recalcitrant countries to welcome immigrants, setting up mandatory quotas that define how many immigrants each EU country must receive, and threatening those countries that declined to obey. Martin Schulz, President of the European Parliament, said that Europe was built in a spirit of “burden sharing,” and that EU breakup was a risk that could not be excluded.

An acute division, in fact, is emerging between the leaders of Western Europe and the leaders of Central Europe. Another division is growing between the populations of Western Europe and their leaders.

Those who rebuilt Europe after World War II thought that an enlightened elite (themselves) could make a clean sweep of the past and build a dream society where peace and perpetual harmony would reign.

Because they thought democracy had brought Hitler to power, they decided to restrict democracy.[1] Because they thought nationalism was the cause of the war, they decreed that nationalism was harmful and that the cultural identities in Europe had to disappear and be replaced by a new “European identity” that they would shape.[2]

Because Europe had a colonialist past and Europeans had believed in the superiority of their cultures, they claimed that Europe should redeem its guilt and affirm that all cultures were equal. And because Islam was at the heart of the culture of people formerly colonized, the Europeans rejected all criticism of Islam, and said that it would blend smoothly into amulticultural Europe. They did not demand the assimilation of Muslims who came to live in Europe in increasing number.

Because the Europeans thought poverty had led to the rise of Nazism, they built welfare states that were supposed to eliminate poverty forever.

Because two world wars had started in Europe, the Europeans decreed that from now on, Europe would renounce the use of force, and solve all conflicts through diplomacy and appeasement.[3]

We now see the results.

European people still have the right to vote, but are deprived of most of their power: all important political decisions in Europe are made behind closed doors, by technocrats and professional politicians, in Brussels or Strasbourg.

Cultural identities in Europe have been eroded to such a point that saying that Europe is based on Judeo-Christian values has become controversial.

Any criticism of Islam in Europe is treated as a form of racism, and “Islamophobia” is considered a crime or a sign of mental illness.

Islam has not melted into a smooth multiculturalism; it is creating increasingly distressing problems that are almost never brought to light.

Muslim criminality across Europe is high. Consequently, the percentage of Muslims in prisonsin Europe is high. In France, which has the largest Muslim population in Europe, the prison population is 70% Muslim. Many European prisons have become recruitment centers for future jihadis.

Muslim riots may occur for any reason : police upholding the law, a Soccer League celebrationor in support of a cause.

Welfare states have created a government-dependent class in Europe of many people who live permanently on social benefits. These people are often Muslim. Much of the time, they are not assimilated – and often show signs of not wanting to assimilate. Many reside in virtually autonomous, so-called no-go zones (e.g. France, the UK, and Germany).

Europe has renounced force; to many, it therefore appears weak, vulnerable and easily able to be overpowered.

Populations of Western Europe increasingly think that the dream society that had been promised has turned into a nightmare. The sudden and often brutal arrival of hundreds of thousands more Muslims most likely prompts Europeans to think the nightmare will get worse. They see, powerlessly, that their leaders speak and act as if they have no awareness of what is happening.

Central European leaders and their people, who have directly experienced authoritarian rule, seem to be thinking that entering the European Union was a huge mistake. When the Soviet Union collapsed, they became members of the EU to join what was called then the “free world.” They do not seem willing to be subjected again to coercive decisions made by outsiders.

After living under the Soviet yoke, they preserved their desire for freedom and self-government, and evidently will not now agree to give them up. They know what submission to Islam could mean. Bulgaria and Romania were occupied by the Ottoman Empire until 1878. Hungary was under the boot of Ottoman rule for more than a hundred and fifty years (1541-1699).

Polls show that a majority of Muslims living in Europe want the application of sharia law and clearly reject any idea of assimilation.

Hundreds of thousands of Muslims living in Europe have joined fundamentalist Islamic organizations. Thousands have joined jihadist movements and are now fighting in Syria or Yemen. Many have returned and are ready to act against Europe.

Illegal Muslim migrants are likely to join the Muslims already living in Europe; and they will remain Muslim. They will live on social benefits until the bankruptcy of welfare states. They will reside in the “no-go zones,” and the “no-go zones” will continue to grow. Their occupants come from countries where Christians and women are mistreated; in Europe, they are already mistreating Christians and women.

They come from countries where Western civilization is despised and where hatred of Jews is inescapable — and this remains so among Muslims already living in Europe. For more than two decades, almost all assaults against Jews in Europe were committed by Muslims.

Many of those who arrive, according to European intelligence sources, are already radicalized.

project to overwhelm Europe by a huge wave of migration was already described by the Islamic State in documents discovered this February. It is hard to rule out that the Islamic State plays a role in what is happening. Turkish authorities are ignoring the massive departurestaking place from their coast. If they really wanted the current process to stop, they could stop it. That is clearly not what they do. The Islamic State could not survive without Turkish help. Daily flights on Turkish Airlines bring illegal migrants to Istanbul; they continue unhindered to Europe. The Russians, in their military intervention in Syria, similarly does not seem interested in stopping what is occurring.

Angela Merkel said in Strasbourg, on October 7, that migrants entering Europe today are attracted to Europe, for the reasons Europeans migrants who arrived in America a century ago were attracted to America: to “realize a dream,” presumably of opportunity.

In all 28 countries of the European Union, birth rates are low and the population is aging. People under thirty account for only 16% of the population, or 80 million people. In the 22 Arab countries, plus Turkey and Iran, people under thirty account for 70% of the population, or 350 million people.

Jews are fleeing Europe in increasing numbers. “Native” Europeans are starting to flee as well.

In 1972, in his book “The Camp of the Saints,” French writer Jean Raspail described flooding Europe with Muslim migrants crossing the Mediterranean. At the time, the book was a work of fiction. Today, it is reality.

Out with the old, in with the new… European officials estimate that 1.5 million migrants, mostly Muslims, will arrive in the European Union this year. Jews are fleeing Europe in increasing numbers. “Native” Europeans are starting to flee as well.

Muslim Extremists: Cheerleading the Killers by Khadija Khan

  • Cheerleading for killers and terror-mongering has become synonymous with the countries where religious extremists enjoy popular and official support.

  • This is exactly what is wrong with the Muslim world, where masses are kept ignorant by these radical mullahs from the real challenges such as poverty, illiteracy and disease.
  • Instead, at the behest of the powerful extremist regimes such as Saudi Arabia and Iran, which throw unlimited money into poor countries to expand their radicalization, extremist religious parties feed the people with the false notion of the supremacy of their creed.
  • Some of the terrorists have entered Europe with the refugees. If this amount is just one percent, that number comes to 10,000 people.
  • However, the wrong political policies of governments in Europe are also to be blamed for the rise of Islamic extremism in the world: they allowed the existence and breeding of such organizations on their soil at the first place.
  • Time has come for those who are still confused about the acts of these terrorists — or those who serve as terrorist apologists to try to cover up their deeds after every incident — to be exposed. A large number of Muslims are already sick and tired of these extremists.
  • We Muslims also need to leave no stone unturned to return the humane gestures that our fellow citizens have shown when we Muslims faced trouble. In the same way they took to the streets for us, it is now our turn to show all our fellow citizens — non-Muslims as well as Muslims — that we also stand by them. Merry Christmas!!!

The world saw a massacre in Aleppo, the assassination of Russian ambassador in Turkey, a brazen terror attack in Berlin and a shooting incident in a Zurich mosque – all just last week. We also saw religious extremists across the Muslim world cheering for the killers of both the Russian envoy and the truck driver in Germany.

ISIS hailed the Berlin terror attack and the killing of the Russian ambassador while themselves facing imminent extinction due to massive Russian, European and US led strikes against their strongholds in Mosul, Raqqa, Aleppo and other cities.

Terrorists such as ISIS and their sympathizers seemed translating this chaos into another opportunity to pour the “victim narrative” into the minds of naïve Muslim youths apparently in the hope of recruiting more soldiers for their holy war.

One incident of the behavior witnessed in Pakistan where the biggest religious political party was seen cheerleading for the anti-Russia attack, hailing the extremist Muslim killer, Melvut Mert-Altintas, as a hero.

Jamaat e Islami (JI), a radical political party in nuclear-armed Pakistan, has never been able to win popular support in the parliament, yet is being blamed for the butchery against Bengalis in 1970s. Jamaat is involved in celebrating the killers, and they have hundreds of thousands of followers across the Subcontinent as well as in Pakistan.

This is not the new trend for JI, as they have been involved in marketing the radical version of Islam while celebrating the terrorists like Osama bin Laden as heroes for decades.

Hence, cheerleading for killers and terror mongering become synonymous with the countries where religious extremists enjoy popular and official support.

This is exactly what is wrong with the Muslim world where masses are kept ignorant by these radical mullahs from the real challenges such as poverty, illiteracy and disease.

Instead, at the behest of the powerful extremist regimes such as Saudi Arabia and Iran, which throw unlimited money into poor countries to expand their radicalization, extremist religious parties feed the people with the false notion of the supremacy of their creed.

It often appears that, out of this havoc, these terror organizations and their handlers are fixed on dragging the world back into the Stone Age by invoking their counterparts in the West as their “rivals” to get the kind of imaginative wars they were taught about by their “spiritual” role models.

The Berlin terror suspect Anis Amri who was shot dead by Italian police in Milan after he opened fire on police for demanding identity documents on Friday.

He was one of the petty criminals who were hooked up by ISIS to massacre so many innocent shoppers in Berlin.

Paris terror attack mastermind Salah Abdeslam is another example of such low-life criminals who took the path of killings in pursuit to become a hero for cause of ISIS.

Anis Amri was reportedly in touch with a hardliner extremist organization in Germany after entering the Europe disguised as an asylum seeker.

There seems to be a clear pattern in the working of such terror organizations, which run as propaganda and recruitment fronts, mostly among youths who are “seeking a purpose” after failing to succeed in life.

However, the wrong political policies of governments in Europe are also to be blamed for the rise of Islamic extremism in the world: they allowed the existence and breeding of such organizations on their soil at the first place.

There are many fanatic groups and organizations operating in the West, such as Hizb ut-Tahrir, TWR True Religion, Al Muhajiroon, Al-Ghurabaa, Al-Shabaab, as well as dozens of small groups operating in different mosques in the name of charity and support for Syrian victims.

On December 23, 2016 two British men were convicted of funding extremists in the Middle Eastern war zone.

Some terrorists have entered Europe with the refugees. If the amount is just one percent, that number comes to 10,000 people. Most of them mainly work only as foot-soldiers during the terror campaign, while instructions and logistics support are provided to them by their already established comrades — such as the Paris attack terrorist, Salah Abdeslam, who killed 130 innocent people and injured more.

Some of the terrorists involved in the attacks in France were reportedly picked up from refugee camps, thus indicating coordinated plotting by these killers.

In the wake of terrorist attacks in 2015, some of the gunmen were identified as routine visitors to Molenbeek, a district of Brussels considered the hub of jihadists, drug addicts and dealers, and gangs, while acting as a no-go zone for police and as a safe haven for criminals.

“Routine visitors” included most of perpetrators of the Belgian attacks: the French-Algerian, Mehdi Nemmouche, who killed four people at Jewish Museum in Brussels, as well as the two suspected terrorists shot dead by Belgian Police in the eastern town of Verviers.

Abdelhamid Abaaoud, one of the planners of the November 2015 terrorist attacks in Paris, was — like many terrorists in Europe — from Molenbeek, Belgium.

These no-go zones, right under the noses of law enforcement agencies, provide terrorists with the opportunity to flourish — and then all asylum seekers have to face the accusation of being suspected terrorists.

The town administrators and the residents of such dark areas, who largely come from an immigrant background, are also to be blamed for presence of such criminal activity in these localities. Because they themselves either sympathize or keep their eyes shut, despite knowing what goes on around them.

European governments have clearly failed to enact strong measures to deal with the danger they were facing. Warnings even intensified after the terror attacks in France and the mass sexual assaults of women by asylum seekers who had mostly slipped illegally into Europe from North Africa and Middle East.

Anis Amri was also such a criminal. He had spent four consecutive years in six prisons in Sicily, Italy, but authorities seemed not to realize the danger he posed. Even in Germany, he would deceive the law enforcement agencies with aliases and fake documents, and by exploiting the insufficient access German authorities seem to have to the overall backgrounds of suspects.

It seems time to take these petty criminals seriously when it comes to dealing with the problem of terrorism, as many of those being allured by the jihadist organizations have a background of small scale crimes.

Amri’s case again puts spotlight on the link between terrorism and the criminal background of the “youths” who join the band wagon of organizations like Islamic State.

Whipped up by extremists, intoxicated by ancient conspiracy theories that Muslims are facing “crusades” by the Christian world and the Jewish Israel, many confused Muslim youths are unable to realize that they are doing more damage to Islam and Muslims by committing such horrible crimes.

Such people, drunk on propaganda, claim to be the “representatives of the Muslims,” thereby putting the credibility of the whole community in question.

Europe was not blindfolded when its leaders invited in so many migrants from the Middle East amidst Syrian conflict; they already knew the risks involved in letting so many people into their countries. Yet many countries, such as Germany, went beyond the call of duty to help victims of the war.

Germany welcomed more refugees than any other nation (ca. 1 million) despite the warnings from their law enforcement agencies that terrorists were also entering Europe among the massive influx of migrants.

The mindset of the extremists in Muslim world that the “crusaders” are threatening them by invading their countries and looting their resources, is one of the biggest hurdles in the way of a campaign to avoid war and colonialism — a “peace campaign” being strenuously promoted in Europe, the US and elsewhere.

The critics of Western Muslims accuse them of lacking empathy towards the victims of Islamic terrorists and a failure to show adequate disassociation from that lot.

Many people across the US and Europe stood by the Muslims when they thought that this minority might be treated less than fairly by Donald Trump who, when he was campaigning, said that he wanted to ensure that Muslims entering the United States should be vetted to make certain they were not terrorists.

People in the US-organized protest rallies in support of Muslims; and Jews, about whom we often speak — unfairly — in disparaging terms, promised to register as Muslims if Trump tried to setup a special entry register for Muslim immigrants.

Student groups organized a human chain of solidarity to secure the Muslim students in the University of Michigan when they wanted to offer prayers in open grounds.

This is just one example of living together where all people from different social backgrounds are willing to stand by each other in the hour of need. Now if some rigid Muslim extremists are determined to kill our fellow citizens or impose their understanding of religion on everyone, and we do not take a fair stand against this, then that criminal silence also makes us accomplices in this injustice.

The Muslims would do well to bear the responsibility of showing solidarity with those who lose their lives in terrorist attacks committed by Islamists and with anyone who is hit by the inhumane acts of these terrorists. The time has come for all of us to understand that cheerleading for the killers is what encourages even more people to join the ranks of terrorism.

Keeping a strict check on extremist organizations and their operations would be needed through more intelligence gathering on their activities if they are related to loyalty and commitment to their own community or ethnic group rather than to society as a whole, and we should do that without discriminating against any religion or political belief.

Both governments and communities will have to put curbs on clergy who exploit Muslim youths by promising them a trip to paradise after committing mass murders.

Regimes such as Saudi Arabia and Iran might be spearheading such extremist campaigns with the design of gaining some political mileage and imposing their mindset on other countries or regions.

We need to send a loud message to terrorists, who are exploiting the name of Islam by unleashing terror against people of different faiths, and clearly state that we Muslims will have nothing to do with them.

Time has come for those who are still confused about the acts of these terrorists – or those who serve as terrorist apologists to try to cover up their deeds after every incident – to be exposed. A large number of Muslims are already sick and tired of these extremists.

We Muslims also need to leave no stone unturned to return the humane gestures that our fellow citizens have shown when we Muslims faced trouble.

In the same way they took to the streets for us, it is now our turn to show all our fellow citizens– non-Muslims as well as Muslims – that we also stand by them. Merry Christmas!!!

Khadija Khan is a Pakistan-based journalist and commentator.

Muslim Arab Offers Cash Reward for Capture of Tel Aviv Terrorist

A Muslim Arab from Jerusalem has joined the search for Nashat Milhem, who shot two Israeli civilians to death in Tel Aviv on Friday and wounded another seven.


Israel police, aided by IDF soldiers and volunteers, are still conducting a large-scale manhunt after Nashat Milhem, the Israeli Arab terrorist who killed two and injured seven in a Tel Aviv shooting attack on New Year’s Day.

A Muslim Arab from Jerusalem has also joined the efforts to capture Milhem. Mazen Qaq, who acts as the chairman of the Committee of Jerusalem’s Old City Merchants, has offered a substantial cash reward for any viable information which could lead to Melhem’s capture.

“If I saw him today I would capture him myself, or at least do whatever it takes for him to be captured,” Qaq told the Israeli press on Tuesday.It is suspected that Milhem has fled to Palestinian Authority-administered territory in Judea and Samaria. Police announced earlier in the day that Tel Aviv residents can calm down regarding the danger posed by Milhem, who is likely armed and could strike again. “As of this morning, the tension in Gush Dan [Tel Aviv district] can be significantly reduced,” Police Commissioner Roni Alsheich stated.

Qaq, who is willing to pay $10,000 of his own money as a reward, said he considers himself to be an Israeli Arab, rather than a Palestinian, and that he represents many Arab business owners in Jerusalem.

“We need to stop with the ‘Arab against Israeli’ narrative. We are all cousins who wish to live in peace,” said Qaq. “This is a man who acted against citizens of Israel, I will not let a man like that destroy our security and our mutual trust.”

Qaq explained that he was motivated to take this action out of the need to restore the trust and close relations between Israeli Arabs and Israeli Jews, which, according to him, have been damaged by the recent wave of terrorism.

However, not everyone is enthusiastic about Qaq’s award initiative. “Whoever is offering money, or whatever initiative someone has taken, is completely irrelevant to the operation,” Chief Inspector Micky Rosenfeld, the Israel police foreign press spokesman, told Tazpit Press Service (TPS).

“We are working on an operational level and on an intelligence level for a realistic solution,” Rosenfeld stated.

By: United with Israel Staff and Michael Zeff, TPS

Muri Kamena intambara yo Mu Rwanda iratangira izamaraamezi (3).

Amakuru agera ku nyangenewss.com,aturutse kumupastor uzwi cyane mukarere k’Ibiyaga bigari,witwa Claire ,ubu urimokuzenguruka akarere kose atanga ubuhanuzi bw’ibigiye kubaho muri Africa,yahuye n’ikinyamakuru inyangenewss.com, abwira ikinyamakuru inyangenewss.com ko,intambara yo mu Rwanda ngo izatangira mukwezi gutaha kwa Kamena ikazarangira muri Kanama.


Twamubajije igihe iyo ntambara igihe izamara,atubwira ko,izamaraamezi atatu,nkuko ubundi buahanuzi bubivuga,ibyo btatumye dushaka kumenya amashira kinyoma maze twitabza umuhanuzi mukuru hamwe n’umuhanuzi tubabaza kur’ubwo buhanuzi bwa pastor Claire maze batubwira yuko koko intambara izaba mu gihe cy’iki,ariko birinda kutubwira ko,ari muri uyu mwaka cyangwa utaha.

Gusa bakomeje batubwira ko ngo ibimenyetso aribyo bishobora kubora abashaka kumenya ibijyanye n’igihe,ariko banatwibutsa ko,mubuhanuzi havuga intebe ya bukunzi izatangira kubyinagira mu gihe gisa nk’iki!Kandi bikazaba ari mu gihe cy’izuba ryinshi.

Tugarutse kuri pastor Claire ,yavuze ko ngo abagiye gutera Urwanda ,ngo ubu bamaze kugera mumisozi ya Uganda hafi y’imipaka y’Urwanda,ibi tukaba tudashobora kubihamya usibye kubyizera nkuko bihanurwa kuko ntabimenyetso tubifitiye!

Gusa umuhanuzi yabaye nk’ubikomozaho,avuga mu marenga ko,rwose icyo gihe cy’amezi (3) ngo bishoboka ariko yirinda kubihamya.Bene data bakundwa mukwiye kwisuzuma kugirango mutaza gutungurwa kuko igihe kirahumuje,icyo ntabahisha ni uko umuhanuzi muri uku kwezi agiye kwinjira mu masezerano bityo akaba arikimwe mubimenyetso byanyuma.

Igisigaye ni uko perezida kabila anyurahobityo ibimenyetsobikaba birangiye,hanyuma iby’Urwanda bigasohoza,iby’ubuhanuzi biragoye kubisobanukirwa ariko reka tubitege amaso kuko urebye ubwoba abayobozi b’Urwanda bafite muri ino minsi sigusa urebye neza urasanga har’icyo babiziho.

Mugabe, Kagame: A comparative analysis May 25, 2014 in Editorial Both Robert Mugabe and Paul Kagame are celebrated freedom fighters who gallantly fought their way to leadership of their respective countries after protracted wars.

Mugabe, Kagame: A comparative analysis May 25, 2014 in Editorial Both Robert Mugabe and Paul Kagame are celebrated freedom fighters who gallantly fought their way to leadership of their respective countries after protracted wars.


Sunday Opinion with Farai WT Taderera Mugabe left home for Mozambique to join the liberation war against colonial rule while Kagame started as a high-ranking officer in the Ugandan Army before he left to lead the Rwandan Patriotic Front on its assault against the French- supported Hutu government of his homeland.

Politics The post-genocide transitional government of national unity of Rwanda took office in 1994 headed by Pasteur Bizumungu as president, but only responsible for home affairs, while Kagame was the defacto ruler as both vice-president and minister of defence, with an added
responsibility of foreign affairs.

Later on in the late 1990s Kagame began to publicly disagree with Bizumungu, accusing him of
mismanagement and corruption so much that the president resigned and the Supreme Court appointed Kagame as the Acting-President. He proceeded to appoint a commission
which drafted a new constitution that was approved by referendum in May 2003.

Among its many laws, the new constitution also sought to prevent Hutu or Tutsi hegemony over political power by prohibiting the formation of political parties along any tribal or ethnic lines.

It is this law that Kagame used to silence opposition in his efforts to preserve unity. For example, the Democratic Republic Movement (MDR), the second largest party after
the RPF in the transitional government, was banned after it was found guilty of spreading divisive ideology by a parliamentary commission.

Bizumungu, who had gone on to form an opposition political party which was hounded out of existence, was later arrested and only released by presidential pardon in 2007.

Kagame was elected for his first seven-year term as President in August 1993 according to the new constitution, after silencing and/or co-opting members of the opposition into the RPF.

Currently serving his final second term, allegations abound of his crack teams in pursuit of opposition elements who flee for safety to neighbouring countries in the region.

Kagame appears in no hurry to retire as he scoffs at critics when asked whether he will change the constitution in order to run for a third term. He insists that countries should be left to decide their own destinies and that he was not elected to leave office, but to do
business on behalf of the Rwandans.

Mugabe came to power as Prime Minister in 1980 and seven years later, amended the constitution to make himself President.

In pursuance of his quest to create a one-party state, he coerced the only opposition then, Zapu, into his Zanu PF party; a process that was never really consummated at grassroots level despite the official rhetoric and the cosmetic appearance of unity.

Since then general elections have been religiously held, with the outcome always in his favour,
especially from the year 2000 with the advent of formidable opposition from the Movement for Democratic Change (MDC) led by trade unionist Morgan Tsvangirai.

Any talk of regime change is viewed as treasonous despite the fact that, that is what elections are all about; a process to challenge the ruling party and replace it with another through the will of the majority.

The war in the DRC The two were protagonists on either side of the Congo War where Kagame
fought to topple Laurent Desire Kabila while Mugabe defended the Congolese leader.

Human Rights groups and other independent organisations have accused both parties of plundering the host country’s mineral wealth.

Rwanda’s economy is alleged to have directly benefitted, with reports of the creation of the so-called Congo Desk where mining companies were allegedly taxed and minerals sold for
the benefit of Rwanda. In the case of Zimbabwe, it is reported that only senior army and government officials personally benefitted from the plunder.

On the economy Shortly after assuming the Presidency, Kagame launched Vision 2020, an ambitious economic development programme consisting of a list of projects for the government to transform the highly impoverished agro-based economy into a middle income country before the year 2020.

As a result, annual economic growth averaged 8%, Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita increased from US$ 567 in 2000 to US$1 592 in 2013.

With 90% of the population in agriculture, Vision 2020 has resulted in the service sector alone
contributing 43,6% of GDP while tourism is the leading foreign exchange earner with 16% of visitorsbeing from outside Africa.

On the business front, the Rwanda Development Board asserts that a business can be authorised and registered in 24 hours; hence the country ranks 52 out of 185 countries
in the world and three out of 46 in sub-Saharan Africa for its overall ease of doing business.

Transparency International ranks it eight out of 47 in sub-Sahara and 66 out of 178 in the world on its corruption index.


On the contrary, Zimbabwe has embarked upon so many economic blueprints, including a Vision 2020 of its own, and even the latest, Zim Asset which is still to be launched with all its attendant shortcomings; this is more than six months after the last elections.

Average annual income has reduced drastically from US$950 in 1980 to below US$400 by the year 2003. One of the earliest development projects, the Economic Structural Adjustment
Programme (Esap), was abandoned midstream.

Even the Land Reform Programme with all its lack of planning, shortcomings and haphazard launch, is still heralded as a monumental success notwithstanding the glaring evidence of food shortages and economic decline.

On a 2010 list of the top 10countries in the world led by Liberia and Mongolia, Transparency
International rated Zimbabwe as thefourth most corrupt.

Conclusion The two men believe they have the divine right to rule until “they have
accomplished their tasks”.

Mugabe will not lift a finger to create the right atmosphere for investment and development of Zimbabwe.

Instead, he looks at such initiatives from a political standpoint; any economic development that takes place must recognise his unfettered rule and comply with programmes
that perpetuate his political life. He has made it known that he is not going anywhere any time soon as he
reserves the right to stand again in 2018.

Kagame on the other hand believes that he is the only one who knows what is good for the people of Rwanda and he has the credentials to prove his point, namely a thriving
economy.He does not see why he should stepdown if he is delivering for hispeople.

The people in turn do appreciate what he has done for them, but believe that at the end of the day, democracy must prevail and he should accordingly pass the baton when his second and final termexpires in 2017.

Skip to toolbar